Media Release

 

Preliminary Accident Report; Fatal Aircraft Crash - Johannesburg International Airport, November 3, 2001

 

Wednesday, May 29, 2002

 

A Cessna F406 twin turbo propeller aircraft, registration ZS – OIG, crashed shortly after takeoff at 3:19am, on Saturday 03 November 2001, at Johannesburg International Airport. The aircraft was on route to Eros Airport, Windhoek, Namibia.

Two crewmembers and one passenger on board were killed. They were the pilots, Eduard Davey (29) from Gauteng, Wesley Hampton – Cole (22) from Gauteng and the passenger Johannes Heinrich Janik (37), a Namibian citizen.

In addition to the crewmembers and passenger there were a substantial amount of cargo, consisting mainly of express freight parcels and two heavy steel bars, each approximately 3m in length, onboard the aircraft    

The Commissioner for Civil Aviation, Trevor Abrahams and the investigator – in – charge, Jacques Grobelaar, have briefed the families of the deceased on the content of the preliminary accident report. This meeting took place this morning (Wednesday) at the CAA office in Brooklyn, Pretoria

“The objective of any aviation accident investigation is not to attribute blame or liability to any individual or organisation but rather to learn from an accident in order to prevent similar occurrences in the future. However, where criminal actions or flagrant violations of the Civil Aviation Regulations occur, the South African Police Service or CAA Enforcement Committee will be activated.

In an accident investigation, it is necessary to consider not only the unsafe act performed by an employee but also the circumstances which may have encouraged the individual to act, including the nature of the systemic and environmental factors which permitted their action to have such serious and immediate consequences” said Trevor Abrahams

On this flight there were no passenger seats installed in the cabin area.  The people responsible for the loading of the aircraft reported that they were instructed by the cargo agents to load the heavy boxes/parcels first in front of the cabin area and the lighter boxes in the centre and rear.  They were also instructed to load the two heavy steel bars on the left side of the aircraft, untied, on top of the boxes.            

After the loading process was completed they had to re-arrange a few boxes in order for the passenger to obtain space.  He was positioned in the rear of the aircraft.  The cargo was loaded from behind the pilot seats from floor level to the roof of the aircraft all the way to the rear. There was no cargo net to secure the cargo as required according to Civil Aviation Regulations.

Shortly after take-off, the ATC attempted to establish contact with the aircraft without any response.  An emergency vehicle was requested to drive along the runway in an attempt to search for the aircraft, as there was no communication with the aircraft.  The emergency vehicle was unable to locate the aircraft on the aerodrome premises. 

According to an eyewitness, he observed the aircraft flying just above the runway when it suddenly pitched up and rolled left (dropping the left wing).  The aircraft impacted the ground in the left wing low attitude approximately 400m from where he was standing.  He immediately phoned his supervisor and advised him of the accident.     

The aircraft was destroyed during impact. There was no post-impact fire. The aircraft crashed in an open marshy area approximately 700m from the threshold of runway 03R (right) at Johannesburg International Airport. 

The preliminary accident report revealed significant findings with regards to the ill-fated flight;

·         It was calculated that the aircraft was operated approximately 1 837.57 pounds (833.51 kg) in excess of its maximum certified take-off mass.

·         The pilot-in-command was the holder of a valid pilot’s license and had the aircraft type endorsed in his logbook.  There was no indication that incapacitation or physiological or psychological factors affected his performance. 

·         According to the co-pilots logbook he was not rated on the aircraft and had no experience on turbo prop/ turbine driven engine aircraft.        

·         No evidence could be found that POH (Pilot’s Operating Handbook) was onboard the aircraft.

·         The cargo was not secured.

·         There was no seat or safety-restraining device for the passenger.

·         The Operator’s GJ Air, AOC (Air Operating Certificate) expired on 30 October 2001 and at the time of the flight was still awaiting the renewal approval from the CAA.

·         GJ Air’s pilot, training, aircraft and operational records were incomplete and not in accordance with the requirements of parts of the Civil Aviation Regulations.

·         The AMO (Aircraft Maintenance Organisation) responsible for the maintenance of the aircraft did not comply with the Civil Aviation Regulations – no records of last few MPI’s in the engine logbooks.

·         The use of ZS-OIG by GJ Air appears to be based on a questionable lease agreement, which the owner of the aircraft claims to be fraudulent.

·         An Aircraft Maintenance Organisation did not attend to certain defects on ZS-OIG, which were reported on two occasions, by previous pilots of ZS - OIG, to a director of New Heights.

·         New Heights personnel appear to be responsible for accessing the aircraft, flight crew and loading of the aircraft.  It was unclear how GJ Air ensured compliance with its operations manual in the conduct of this flight. 

·         Modifications were installed on the aircraft (lead acid battery, wheel brake assemblies and leading edge paint coating) without the manufacturers or CAA approval including the replacement of the outer wing leading edge de-ice boots by an unapproved wing leading edge harsh anti-erosion rubber paint. 

·         The aircraft appears to have been released to service despite the engines having exceeded their TBO limits.  The maintenance records of engine changes to ZS-OIG also appear to be incomplete.

 

The Preliminary Accident Report states the following interim recommendations:

·         It is recommended that the CAA airworthiness department review the system of weighing and reweighing of aircraft on the South African register, in particularly the case of F406 aircraft.  (The accident aircraft was manufactured in 1989 and the basic empty weight was calculated by the manufacturer as 5 479.09 pounds. The aircraft was re-weighed in South Africa on 12 October 1998 and the basic empty weight was calculated as 5 210 pounds). 

·         The CAA Legal Department investigates and reports on the operational discrepancies relating to the lease of ZS-OIG from the owner to GJ Air.

·         The CAA Operations and Legal Departments review the role and function of GJ Air with regard to the compliance with Civil Aviation Regulations and GJ Air’s operations manual, given the findings.

·         The CAA Operations and Legal Departments review the role and function of the operator New Heights throughout the course of this operation to determine what this operator’s effective role was in this accident.   

·         The CAA Airworthiness and Legal Department review the states of the engines on the accident aircraft and the AMO’s, which were responsible for servicing and installing these engines.

·         The CAA Airworthiness Department to ensure that AMO’s conduct sound practices with regard to maintenance by not certifying maintenance release certificates, logbooks or Inspections Reports (TV2/72) if they are aware of a non compliance or  excess in the TBO (Time Between Overall) time of any major component including engines.       

·         The CAA Airworthiness and Legal Department review the unauthorised modifications found on the accident aircraft and determine the circumstances and which AMO’s were responsible for effecting these modifications.

 

The operator undertook this fatal flight with the full knowledge that the existing AOC expired on the October 31, 2001. This, after a notice from the CAA, have been received by the operator in June 2001, reminding the owners of GJ Air that their AOC will lapsed at the end of October in the same year.

After careful consideration of the application, the Commissioner decided against the renewal of the operating certificate as GJ Air have failed to operate a safe operation and non - compliance with the Civil Aviation Regulations.

For Further Information, contact
Trevor Davids
083 635 0068